The right to believe, to worship and witness
The right to change one’s belief or religion
The right to join together and express one’s belief
KAZAKHSTAN: Wife to be jailed for advocating for husband jailed in Xinjiang?
Guldaria Sherizat, an ethnic Kazakh originally from Xinjiang, is among 19 people on trial in Taldykorgan on 23 January for "inciting national discord against the Chinese people". At a demonstration she called for freedom for her husband Alimnur Turganbay, jailed in Xinjiang since July 2025. He had called in a 2019 video for freedom for his nephew and two other Muslims jailed in Xinjiang for 17 years for praying. Sherizat's family say this is a freedom of religion case, as she advocated for her husband who had defended his nephew jailed for exercising freedom of religion or belief.
Several of the protesters then burnt three Chinese flags and one portrait of Chinese President Xi Jinping. It appears that Sherizat did not actively take part in holding or lighting the flags or portrait. Uyghur District Police soon arrived (see below).
Sherizat insists the protest was peaceful. "We could not remain silent. Therefore, we were forced to make a direct appeal to the Chinese authorities" (see below).
"All the female participants received administrative fines, while most male participants were detained from 7 to 15 days," the family told Forum 18 (see below).
The day after the demonstration, the Chinese authorities wrote to Kazakhstan's Foreign Ministry expressing "deep concern", according to the indictment. "Taking into account the political mutual trust between the two countries, the High Representative asks the Government to pay close attention to it and take appropriate measures based on the results of a thorough investigation" (see below).
The 19 defendants were then charged with "inciting national discord against the Chinese people and insulting the national honour and dignity of citizens, in a premeditated conspiracy with a group of people, using the mass media", according to the indictment seen by Forum 18. They face from five to 10 years' imprisonment if convicted. The 13 men were put in pre-trial detention, while the six women were put under house arrest (see below).
The duty officer at Uyghur District Police refused to answer any questions about the police action at the demonstration. He said the District Police chief Erlik Urkimbayev was out of the office and no one else could discuss the police action. Neither Captain M. Orazgaziyev – who prepared the indictment - nor officials at Uyghur District Prosecutor's Office answered the phones each time Forum 18 called (see below).
It remains unclear why the trial was transferred to Taldykorgan, over 300 kms and four hours by road from Sherizat's home. The Judge's secretary said the Judge had decided this, but refused to say why (see below).
"We don't know why they've transferred the case to a court in a different Region," Almaty-based lawyer Shinkuat Baizhanov, who is representing all 19 defendants, told Forum 18. He insists the case is illegal as the participants have already been punished under the Administrative Code. "Under the Constitution, individuals cannot be punished twice for the same thing" (see below).
Sherizat's family say the case is a freedom of religion case, as she advocated for her husband who had defended his nephew who had been jailed for exercising freedom of religion or belief in Xinjiang. They say the others did too. "The cases of the other 18 people are also related to freedom of religion or belief," the family insist (see below).
Religious restrictions for Xinjiang's ethnic Kazakhs
In May 2014, Chinese regime launched what it termed a "Strike Hard" campaign to combat alleged terrorist threats, which it linked to religious "extremism" and separatism in the north-western province of Xinjiang. Many have been imprisoned in "re-education" camps.The Chinese regime's restrictions on the rights of non-ethnic Chinese in Xinjiang have mainly targeted the Uyghur population. But they also target Xinjiang's 1.5 million strong ethnic Kazakh community, the second-largest Turkic population.
"The 'Strike Hard' campaign has led to the adoption or amendment of various legal instruments to further tighten the regulation of religion," the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights noted in an August 2022 report. "Religious activities are allowed only in Government-approved locations, conducted by Government-accredited personnel, and on the basis of Government-approved teachings and publications."
The UN report noted the closure and demolition of mosques and the attempts to eradicate many Muslim practices that "in themselves constitute exercise of protected fundamental freedoms connected to the enjoyment of cultural and religious life".
Many ethnic Kazakhs from Xinjiang have migrated in recent decades to Kazakhstan, where they can easily settle and obtain Kazakh citizenship. Many in the community in Kazakhstan have voiced public concern over violations of the rights of ethnic Kazakhs in Xinjiang. The Kazakh regime has been nervous about these complaints and has tried to suppress them.
Jailed in Xinjiang
The Chinese authorities arrested Serik Dauitbek, a member of Xinjiang's ethnic Kazakh minority and a Muslim, in March 2018. They arrested two other local ethnic Kazakhs at the same time. In June 2018, the three were jailed, apparently for about 17 years each, for praying and reading the Koran, according to human rights defenders. Family members do not appear to have been given copies of any written court decision.Advocating for his nephew
On 24 January 2019, Turganbay filmed an appeal for his jailed nephew and the two other men jailed with him. The Atajurt (Fatherland) group, which campaigns for the rights of China's ethnic Kazakhs, posted the video on YouTube.
Turganbay later felt safe to revisit China for the first time since he left in 2017. On 23 July 2025, working as a lorry driver, he crossed the border to collect building materials to transport to Uzbekistan. Chinese border officials detained him at the Dulata (Dula) border crossing while allowing other Kazakh drivers through. For months Chinese officials gave no information to relatives about why they had detained him or what his subsequent fate was.
"The Chinese side said that a court hearing was held and a sentence of 2 years, 6 months was issued, but we have not seen any written judgment or official document," Turganbay's family told Forum 18 on 19 January 2026. "They also refuse to provide any paper records to our relatives there."
"The Chinese arrested Alimnur because he defended his jailed nephew," Sherizat's lawyer Shinkuat Baizhanov told Forum 18 from Almaty on 19 January 2026.
Fellow ethnic Kazakh migrants from Xinjiang living in Uzynagash have supported the family.
"I have been a neighbour of this family for 25 years, first over there, now over here," said Nazira Baizhuma, another Yining County native, told Chris Rickleton and Beiimbet Moldagali in an article for Freedom for Eurasia in August 2025. "Alimnur is a kindhearted and hard-working man. He doesn't drink, doesn't smoke. In China, he was not attached to any religious organizations. Everything that he has achieved, he has achieved with his own hard work."
Another Uzynagash resident, Yeleusiz Aidarkhan, supported her character assessment. "Day and night his children are crying, not sleeping," he told Freedom For Eurasia. "The smile has disappeared from their faces and they feel grief. We have come here today to ask you to help us find him."
Advocating for her husband
Immediately after Alimnur Turganbay's July 2025 arrest on the Chinese border, his wife Guldaria Sherizat (born 10 September 1978) began advocating for his release. She was among protesters from the Atajurt organisation outside the Chinese Consulate in the southern city of Almaty. She had visited the consulate many times trying to get information about her husband.On 13 November 2025, she and 18 other protesters held a demonstration near the village of Kalzhat in Uyghur District of Almaty Region, on the eastern side of the Shonzhi-Kalzhat highway.
"It's been four months since Alimnur was captured by these Chinese," the subsequent indictment quotes Sherizat as telling fellow-protesters. "Since then, these Chinese have not given us any concrete answers. That's why I will not stop my opposition to the Chinese until Alimnur is released. Our opposition is our opposition, because Alimnur is a citizen of Kazakhstan."
Other protesters also spoke out about Turganbay's case and also raised wider concerns about the Chinese regime's treatment of the ethnic Kazakh minority. One protester complained that "the Chinese have imprisoned so many of our innocent brothers in camps, so many people have died, so many people are already suffering in prison, and those who have come out of the camps themselves have lost their health and are now suffering".
Several of the protesters then burnt three Chinese flags and one portrait of Chinese President Xi Jinping. It appears that Sherizat did not actively take part in holding or lighting the flags or portrait.
Arrests, fines, short-term detentions
Police arrived in several cars at the site of the demonstration on 13 November 2025. The duty officer at Uyghur District Police refused to answer any questions on 15 January 2026 about the police action at the demonstration. He told Forum 18 the District Police chief Erlik Urkimbayev was out of the office and no one else could discuss the police action.On the day of the demonstration, supporters of the demonstration posted videos online. That same day, police "discovered" the video on Atajurt's social media sites and sent it for investigation.
On the evening of 13 November, a local police officer drew up a record of an offence against Sherizat (seen by Forum 18) for "minor hooliganism" (Administrative Code Article 434, Part 1). She was fined 78,640 Tenge (about 2 weeks' average wage).
"All the female participants received administrative fines, while most male participants were detained from 7 to 15 days," the family told Forum 18.
Sherizat insists the protest was peaceful. "We could not remain silent. Therefore, we were forced to make a direct appeal to the Chinese authorities."
Indictment follows Chinese pressure
The same day, despite the administrative prosecutions, Uyghur District Police began a criminal case against the 19 protesters, including Guldaria Sherizat.
The case was launched under Criminal Code Article 174, Part 2. This punishes "Incitement of social, national, clan, racial, or religious discord, insult to the national honour and dignity or religious feelings of citizens, as well as propaganda of exclusivity, superiority or inferiority of citizens on grounds of their religion, class, national, generic or racial identity, committed publicly or with the use of mass media or information and communication networks, as well as by production or distribution of literature or other information media, promoting social, national, clan, racial, or religious discord" when conducted by a group.
Punishments are a jail term of five to ten years, with the possibility of a post-prison ban on certain activities or roles.
Investigators subsequently searched the homes of at least 6 of the protesters, including Sherizat. They also interrogated all 19 protesters.
On 21 November 2025, a court ordered that the 13 male protesters be placed in pre-trial detention. The 6 female protesters – including Sherizat - were placed under house arrest in the following days, according to the subsequent indictment. The 6 women were required to wear electronic tags to monitor their location.
On 3 December 2025, investigators used facial recognition technology on the videos of the demonstration to confirm the identities of the 19 protesters.
On 19 December 2025, Captain M. Orazgaziyev of Uyghur District Police completed the indictment against the 19 protesters. It claimed that all 19 were guilty of "inciting national discord against the Chinese people and insulting the national honour and dignity of citizens, in a premeditated conspiracy with a group of people, using the mass media".
The indictment (seen by Forum 18) was endorsed by Gabit Turmanov, the Prosecutor of Uyghur District.
Neither Captain Orazgaziyev nor officials at Uyghur District Prosecutor's Office answered the phones each time Forum 18 called between 15 and 20 January 2026.
23 January trial
However, the case will be heard not in Shelek but in the premises of Taldykorgan City Court in Zhetisu Region. This is more than 300 kms and a four-hour road journey from Sherizat's home in Uzynagash.
"Judge Baibolov decided that the trial should take place in Taldykorgan," the Judge's secretary Zhasulan Aitbai told Forum 18 on 20 January. He refused to say why. "The Judge and all the team will travel up there on Friday for the hearing. It will probably take about four hours to get there."
"We don't know why they've transferred the case to a court in a different Region," Almaty-based lawyer Shinkuat Baizhanov, who is representing all 19 defendants, told Forum 18 on 19 January. "They decided. They do what they like."
Of the 19 defendants, 13 are due to be brought to court from pre-trial detention. The six women – including Sherizat – are under house arrest.
All 19 defendants are facing charges under Criminal Code Article 174, Part 2. This punishes "Incitement of social, national, clan, racial, or religious discord, insult to the national honour and dignity or religious feelings of citizens, as well as propaganda of exclusivity, superiority or inferiority of citizens on grounds of their religion, class, national, generic or racial identity, committed publicly or with the use of mass media or information and communication networks, as well as by production or distribution of literature or other information media, promoting social, national, clan, racial, or religious discord" when conducted by a group.
Punishments are a jail term of five to ten years, with the possibility of a post-prison ban on certain activities or roles.
"I consider the case illegal," the lawyer Baizhanov told Forum 18. "Participants were punished first under the Administrative Code, and then they brought a case under the Criminal Code. Under the Constitution, individuals cannot be punished twice for the same thing."
Sherizat's family say the case is a freedom of religion case, as she advocated for her husband who had defended his nephew who had been jailed for exercising freedom of religion or belief in Xinjiang. "The cases of the other 18 people are also related to freedom of religion or belief," the family insists. (END)
More reports on freedom of thought, conscience and belief in Kazakhstan
For background information, see Forum 18's Kazakhstan freedom of religion or belief survey
Forum 18's compilation of Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) freedom of religion or belief commitments
Follow us on Bluesky @Forum18
Follow us on Facebook @Forum18NewsService
Follow us on Telegram @Forum18NewsService
Follow us on WhatsApp Forum 18
Follow us on X/Twitter @Forum_18
All Forum 18 material may be referred to, quoted from, or republished in full, if Forum 18 is credited as the source.
All photographs that are not Forum 18's copyright are attributed to the copyright owner. If you reuse any photographs from Forum 18's website, you must seek permission for any reuse from the copyright owner or abide by the copyright terms the copyright owner has chosen.
© Forum 18 News Service. All rights reserved. ISSN 1504-2855.
Latest Analyses
Latest News
9 January 2026
KAZAKHSTAN: Complaint against church "under pressure and dictation from police"
In November, police raided a Baptist church's worship meeting in Balpyk-Bi, blocking the doors. Those present rejected pressure to write statements. When church leaders refused to register the church, police took administrative cases to court, but a judge dismissed them in December. In September, police visited a Baptist church in Shu. A woman who complained that the church was teaching children later admitted she wrote the complaint "under pressure and dictation from the police". Police interrogated a pastor's child in school in the parents' absence. Police in both cases refused to comment.
8 December 2025
KAZAKHSTAN: Fined, ordered deported, but torture unpunished
On 21 November, Kentau Town Court fined and ordered deported Jehovah's Witness Daniyar Tursynbayev – an Uzbek citizen - for posting on Telegram about his faith. Deportation is suspended, pending his appeal. "Deportation will separate Daniyar Tursynbayev from his wife and infant daughter - citizens of Kazakhstan - or force them to leave the country," Jehovah's Witnesses complain. "The conviction is based solely on testimony obtained under torture." Lieutenant Colonel Baglan Yankin – one of four police officers suspected of the torture – denies it. Tursynbayev "invented it all", he claims.
14 November 2025
KAZAKHSTAN: Prosecutors stall criminal investigation into police torture of Jehovah's Witness
A court had to order Kentau Prosecutor's Office to begin a criminal investigation into police torture of and murder threats to Jehovah's Witness Daniyar Tursynbayev on 13 August. But prosecutors stalled the investigation, insisting that Tursynbayev – who fled to Almaty fearing for his safety – must testify in person. "This can't be done appropriately by video," says an official. No one has been arrested or tried. Lieutenant Colonel Baglan Yankin, who denies leading the torture, remains in post. "On what basis should I be removed from duty?" he asks.


